🚨Introducing the Revolutionary 'Viral Isolation™ Method' 🚨
Because Who Needs the Scientific Method When You Have Consensus™?
Are you a virologist looking to isolate a virus but don’t want to deal with pesky scientific principles? Do you long for a world where assumptions are facts, controls are optional, and results are whatever you need them to be? Well, look no further! With Viral Isolation™, you, too, can bypass every fundamental step of the scientific method and still get published!
🎉 Special Features – Now with ZERO Adherence to the Scientific Method! 🎉
🔬 Step 1: Skip Direct Observation!
Why waste time finding a virus in nature when you can just assume it exists? Don’t worry—no one in ‘virology’ has ever observed a virus as a distinct, independent entity directly from a sick person’s fluids. If they haven’t done it in over a century, why start now?
💡 Bonus: Instead of isolating a virus, just declare symptoms = virus. Got a cough? Must be a virus! Fever? Definitely a virus! Ate bad sushi? Yep - virus!!
📏 Step 2: The Hypothesis-Free Hypothesis™!
Real science requires an Independent Variable (IV) (the thing being tested), but who has time for that? Since we never actually isolate a virus, we’ll just assume it’s there. Science is hard—so let’s just skip the part where we identify our IV!
🧐 Scientific Method Violation:
✅ No purified virus? No problem! Just declare the existence of one and move on.
✅ Symptoms are vague? Who cares? A fever must mean viral infection!
✅ What about controls? HAHAHA, good one.
🧪 Step 3: Experimental Design... Or Lack Thereof!
Time to “prove” viral replication! But instead of isolating and testing a virus, let’s throw patient samples into a blender of monkey kidney cells, toxic antibiotics, fetal bovine serum, and a battery of chemicals! What could go wrong?
🧬 Pro-Tip: When the monkey kidney cells start dying from all the poison you added, just call it a Cytopathic Effect (CPE) and claim the virus did it! (Ignore the fact that control experiments show the same results without a virus—just pretend those don’t exist!)
📸 Step 4: The Electron Microscope Magic Show!
Now, let’s get some ‘proof.’ Instead of isolating and purifying a virus, just snap a picture of the cellular debris from our CPE Toxicity Soup™ and say, "See? That blob right there—totally a virus."
🔍 Fun Fact: If someone asks why you didn’t purify and separate the virus, just roll your eyes and mutter, “You don’t understand virology.” That’ll shut them up!
📊 Step 5: Data Manipulation & Narrative Control!
Science should be about unbiased analysis... but where’s the fun in that? With Viral Isolation™, you can:
✅ Assemble ‘viral genomes’ on a computer, even if no complete ‘genome’ was found! (Computers never make mistakes.)
✅ Use PCR to ‘detect’ tiny ‘genetic fragments,’ from a ‘virus’ never proven to exist.
✅ Ignore all contradictory evidence, and call anyone who questions your methods a science denier™!
🧠 Step 6: Declare Success No Matter What!
In real science, if an experiment fails, the hypothesis should be rejected. But with Viral Isolation™, failure is never an option!
🚫 Found no actual virus? Publish anyway!
🚫 Control experiments contradict your results? Ignore them!
🚫 No reproducibility? Silence the skeptics!
🌟 SPECIAL BONUS! – Support the Digital Biosecurity State! 🌟
By believing in this groundbreaking Non-Scientific Methodology™, YOU, too, can:
💰 Enable the Biosecurity State™ – The more viruses we ‘find,’ the more lockdowns, mandates, and surveillance we can justify!
📉 Help Crush Small Businesses! – Nothing says ‘progress’ like eliminating those pesky local shops and centralizing power!
🛑 Contribute to The Great Reset™! – Because why have freedom when you can have digital IDs, carbon quotas, and endless health passports?
🚀 ORDER NOW! 🚀
For a limited time, get your Viral Isolation™ Kit for the low price of your critical thinking skills!
(Side effects include cognitive dissonance, FOIA-induced panic attacks, and an uncontrollable urge to shout, “Trust the Science!” at anyone who asks for evidence.)
💥 Viral Isolation™ – Where Assumptions Become Facts!💥
Round and Round they go. Even if the indirect methods were legit, they're not, they would still need to demonstrate contagion in a real world environment. They would need to expose well people to these invisible particles via natural methods and observe the same symptoms they claim the particles cause.
Does DNA RNA as unique substances exist ? How did they discover these unique substances? Was it a discovery or invention? How they go about isolating these things? What is being isolated ? Is that really what they call DNA? It seems DNA RNA is another layer or deception To give virology and impression of untouchable subject. If there is no DNA RNA then there is no point of using that particular body of knowledge to gain further understanding of viruses.
Re: Next paper i'm expecting on genetics. because if genetics is pseudoscience, then there is no classification thus different families of viruses. genetics slits the throat of ten headed snake at the stem.
Totally agree!! That’s why I wrote a promo for the original ’DNA’ recipe:
🚨SCIENCE BREAKTHROUGH!! 'DNA ISOLATION’ (ORIGINAL 1869 MIESCHER RECIPE) − NOW AVAILABLE IN EXTRA-DEGRADED ‘PURITY’!!🚨
(Brought to you by Circular Reasoning and the Reification Fallacies Brothers - your go-to-team for making everything sound more scientific than it actually is!)
🕺SCIENTISTS HAVE DONE IT AGAIN!! ⚗️
Our brilliant researchers, armed with test tubes, acid flasks, and a reckless disregard for molecular integrity, have 'isolated' 'DNA' 🧬🧬
💥 But how did we achieve this monumental feat? Simple!! By violently obliterating biological material beyond recognition, we have managed to extract what we believe (hope?) to be DNA. 🧬🧬 Using a combination of surgical waste, industrial-strength solvents, and an unshakeable commitment to confirmation bias, we now present to you:
🧬Tortured Precipitate of DNA™ − Now in Historical Accuracy Edition!
🚨 HOW DID WE DO IT? THE FOOLPROOF 1869 METHOD 🚨
✅ Step 1: Visit your nearest clinic and secure the finest pus-soaked surgical bandages. Nothing but the best leukocyte-laden filth will do for our cutting-edge 'science.'
✅ Step 2: Drench those festering bandages in a sodium sulfate solution to ‘gently’ separate the leukocytes (white blood cells).
✅Step 3: Wash the leukocytes several times with hydrochloric acid until the cell walls and cytoplasm give up and dissolve. If your sample still resembles something organic, apply more acid!
✅ Step 4: Next up, Ether!! For any stubborn cytoplasmic leftovers, introduce ether and shake like an unhinged Victorian chemist to remove any leftovers of the cytoplasm.
✅ Step5: Precipitate Mystery Goo – The ‘Eureka’ Moment! Add sodium carbonate (alkali) to your abused nuclei, then drown them in acid. Observe as a mysterious white precipitate emerges—Congratulations! You have officially bullied something into being!!
✅ Step 6: Observe and Take Notes on Your 'Discovery' – Watch as your ‘nuclein’ obediently solidifies in acid and vanishes in alkali, performing a neat chemical trick that proves… something. Convince yourself this is an entirely novel substance and not just the result of aggressive chemistry.
✅ Step 7: Verify ‘Purity’ by Setting It on Fire – Having worked tirelessly to extract this fragile substance, it's now time to destroy it. Burn it to analyze the byproducts! Phosphorus? Check. Nitrogen? Check. Sulfur? No? Great, it must not be protein. Declare the sacred blueprint of life!
✅ Step 8: Ascribe It to Heredity Without Any Real Evidence – Since your unknown substance came from nuclei, it must have something to do with heredity, right?
GENIUS! 🎉 BUT WAIT… IS THIS REALLY DNA? 🤔
🔥 Critics claim that dissolving organic material in acid and setting it on fire may not be the best way to isolate genetic material. Nonsense! We assure you, any 'hereditary substance' that somehow survives our 19th-century chemical gauntlet is 100% legitimate (because we say so).
Besides, if there was no DNA to begin with, how did we find it after chemically forcing it into existence? 🤷♂️ # CheckmateDeniers
FREQUENTLY AVOIDED QUESTIONS (FAQ)
🧐 Q: If DNA is the molecule of life, why does it need to be chemically reconstructed from cellular wreckage?
🔬 A: Silence, please. We are doing science.
🧐 Q: Why don’t we just isolate a fully intact, unmodified DNA molecule?
🔬 A: Because then we wouldn’t need grant money to keep “discovering” it.
🧐 Q: Isn’t this just circular reasoning?
🔬 A: Absolutely not! We assumed DNA exists, looked for DNA, and found what we assumed. That’s called scientific rigor.
LIMITED-TIME OFFER! ORDER YOUR "PURE" DNA TODAY!
🚀 For just $9.99, we’ll send you your very own sample of degraded nucleic acid sludge—freshly extracted from our state-of-the-art boiling vat of molecular destruction. Call now, and we’ll throw in an extra dose of hydrochloric ether —FREE! ⚗️
📞 Call 1-800-DNA-FAKE to claim your personalized double-helix experience! 🧬🕺
💰 Hurry! Supplies are infinite (because we can just dissolve more leukocytes in acid).
🚨 WARNING: MAY CONTAIN ZERO ACTUAL DNA.
☠️ Side effects include: extreme skepticism, spontaneous questioning of mainstream science, and an uncontrollable urge to expose scientific fraud.
Today's sponsor: The Acid Bath Consortium™ – “If It’s Not Chemically Mangled, It’s Not Real!”
If we can with 100% certainty say that genetics is pseudoscience, then we can with 100% certainty say that classification of viruses thus established fact that there are different families of viruses is false. Since classification is based on this body of knowledge.
Mendelian genetics is real and the likes of cannabis plats have undergone selective breeding to give a vastly different product from what they started with.
Once you get into sequencing then I am in agreement that it's largely pseudoscience, and I spent 4 years of my life getting a degree in molecular biology, which had 75% of the classes shared with the genetics students.
Thank you very much for this extensive and thought-provoking post. I completely concur with your main thesis that virology is based on circular reasoning in that it assumes what must be proven. One problem I see is that you assume that the existence of viruses has been scientifically established but better methods should be developed for isolating viruses that are separate from the problematic cell culture method based as it is in the logical fallacy of circular reasoning. This somewhat ironically, assumes what must be proven, which is that viruses physically exist and can be demonstrated by proper scientific methods. To date, the methods used are not free of the logical fallacy of circular reasoning nor are they scientific in the sense that the alleged virus is never actually/physically isolated, among other well-known deficiencies.
I may have misunderstood you, but your text seems to speak of viral isolation as if the cell culture method actually/physically isolates a virus, which it does not do if we interpret the term “isolation” to mean, physically separate it from all other constituents. Had you said, ‘other methods should be devised in an attempt to scientifically prove the existence of viruses’, I would agree. I look forward to hearing your reactions. Thanks again for your efforts.
You can see cancer cells under a microscope. Admittedly I don't know all the details, but it's a whole different ball game from all these indirect ways of "proving" a virus exists.
Cells usually undergo cell death / apoptosis after a while, but this doesn't happen in cancer cell lines, so we have the HeLa cell line that has been used for ages, and the cells don't die.
🚨Introducing the Revolutionary 'Viral Isolation™ Method' 🚨
Because Who Needs the Scientific Method When You Have Consensus™?
Are you a virologist looking to isolate a virus but don’t want to deal with pesky scientific principles? Do you long for a world where assumptions are facts, controls are optional, and results are whatever you need them to be? Well, look no further! With Viral Isolation™, you, too, can bypass every fundamental step of the scientific method and still get published!
🎉 Special Features – Now with ZERO Adherence to the Scientific Method! 🎉
🔬 Step 1: Skip Direct Observation!
Why waste time finding a virus in nature when you can just assume it exists? Don’t worry—no one in ‘virology’ has ever observed a virus as a distinct, independent entity directly from a sick person’s fluids. If they haven’t done it in over a century, why start now?
💡 Bonus: Instead of isolating a virus, just declare symptoms = virus. Got a cough? Must be a virus! Fever? Definitely a virus! Ate bad sushi? Yep - virus!!
📏 Step 2: The Hypothesis-Free Hypothesis™!
Real science requires an Independent Variable (IV) (the thing being tested), but who has time for that? Since we never actually isolate a virus, we’ll just assume it’s there. Science is hard—so let’s just skip the part where we identify our IV!
🧐 Scientific Method Violation:
✅ No purified virus? No problem! Just declare the existence of one and move on.
✅ Symptoms are vague? Who cares? A fever must mean viral infection!
✅ What about controls? HAHAHA, good one.
🧪 Step 3: Experimental Design... Or Lack Thereof!
Time to “prove” viral replication! But instead of isolating and testing a virus, let’s throw patient samples into a blender of monkey kidney cells, toxic antibiotics, fetal bovine serum, and a battery of chemicals! What could go wrong?
🧬 Pro-Tip: When the monkey kidney cells start dying from all the poison you added, just call it a Cytopathic Effect (CPE) and claim the virus did it! (Ignore the fact that control experiments show the same results without a virus—just pretend those don’t exist!)
📸 Step 4: The Electron Microscope Magic Show!
Now, let’s get some ‘proof.’ Instead of isolating and purifying a virus, just snap a picture of the cellular debris from our CPE Toxicity Soup™ and say, "See? That blob right there—totally a virus."
🔍 Fun Fact: If someone asks why you didn’t purify and separate the virus, just roll your eyes and mutter, “You don’t understand virology.” That’ll shut them up!
📊 Step 5: Data Manipulation & Narrative Control!
Science should be about unbiased analysis... but where’s the fun in that? With Viral Isolation™, you can:
✅ Assemble ‘viral genomes’ on a computer, even if no complete ‘genome’ was found! (Computers never make mistakes.)
✅ Use PCR to ‘detect’ tiny ‘genetic fragments,’ from a ‘virus’ never proven to exist.
✅ Ignore all contradictory evidence, and call anyone who questions your methods a science denier™!
🧠 Step 6: Declare Success No Matter What!
In real science, if an experiment fails, the hypothesis should be rejected. But with Viral Isolation™, failure is never an option!
🚫 Found no actual virus? Publish anyway!
🚫 Control experiments contradict your results? Ignore them!
🚫 No reproducibility? Silence the skeptics!
🌟 SPECIAL BONUS! – Support the Digital Biosecurity State! 🌟
By believing in this groundbreaking Non-Scientific Methodology™, YOU, too, can:
💰 Enable the Biosecurity State™ – The more viruses we ‘find,’ the more lockdowns, mandates, and surveillance we can justify!
📉 Help Crush Small Businesses! – Nothing says ‘progress’ like eliminating those pesky local shops and centralizing power!
🛑 Contribute to The Great Reset™! – Because why have freedom when you can have digital IDs, carbon quotas, and endless health passports?
🚀 ORDER NOW! 🚀
For a limited time, get your Viral Isolation™ Kit for the low price of your critical thinking skills!
(Side effects include cognitive dissonance, FOIA-induced panic attacks, and an uncontrollable urge to shout, “Trust the Science!” at anyone who asks for evidence.)
💥 Viral Isolation™ – Where Assumptions Become Facts!💥
Holy shit dude! That's the best damn round up of the #bullshitscam I've read yet! You. Are. A. Legend.
Tribal council have spoken and you are a keeper!
LOL!! 😃 CHEERS, GUV!!
Oh this was beautiful. It deserves its own trophy.🏆
Best comment I've ever read on manifesting viral abundance.
It should be framed and hung on every wall, right alongside that expensive college degree.
LOL😃!! MASSIVE THANKS for the positive feedback!! Greatly appreciated!! 👍👍
Excellent comment. I will share it.
HUGE THANKS!! 👍👍
One of best comments I have ever read hands down . Brilliant.
👍👍😀MASSIVE THANKS!! 💥🎉
Round and Round they go. Even if the indirect methods were legit, they're not, they would still need to demonstrate contagion in a real world environment. They would need to expose well people to these invisible particles via natural methods and observe the same symptoms they claim the particles cause.
Does DNA RNA as unique substances exist ? How did they discover these unique substances? Was it a discovery or invention? How they go about isolating these things? What is being isolated ? Is that really what they call DNA? It seems DNA RNA is another layer or deception To give virology and impression of untouchable subject. If there is no DNA RNA then there is no point of using that particular body of knowledge to gain further understanding of viruses.
Re: Next paper i'm expecting on genetics. because if genetics is pseudoscience, then there is no classification thus different families of viruses. genetics slits the throat of ten headed snake at the stem.
Totally agree!! That’s why I wrote a promo for the original ’DNA’ recipe:
🚨SCIENCE BREAKTHROUGH!! 'DNA ISOLATION’ (ORIGINAL 1869 MIESCHER RECIPE) − NOW AVAILABLE IN EXTRA-DEGRADED ‘PURITY’!!🚨
(Brought to you by Circular Reasoning and the Reification Fallacies Brothers - your go-to-team for making everything sound more scientific than it actually is!)
🕺SCIENTISTS HAVE DONE IT AGAIN!! ⚗️
Our brilliant researchers, armed with test tubes, acid flasks, and a reckless disregard for molecular integrity, have 'isolated' 'DNA' 🧬🧬
💥 But how did we achieve this monumental feat? Simple!! By violently obliterating biological material beyond recognition, we have managed to extract what we believe (hope?) to be DNA. 🧬🧬 Using a combination of surgical waste, industrial-strength solvents, and an unshakeable commitment to confirmation bias, we now present to you:
🧬Tortured Precipitate of DNA™ − Now in Historical Accuracy Edition!
🚨 HOW DID WE DO IT? THE FOOLPROOF 1869 METHOD 🚨
✅ Step 1: Visit your nearest clinic and secure the finest pus-soaked surgical bandages. Nothing but the best leukocyte-laden filth will do for our cutting-edge 'science.'
✅ Step 2: Drench those festering bandages in a sodium sulfate solution to ‘gently’ separate the leukocytes (white blood cells).
✅Step 3: Wash the leukocytes several times with hydrochloric acid until the cell walls and cytoplasm give up and dissolve. If your sample still resembles something organic, apply more acid!
✅ Step 4: Next up, Ether!! For any stubborn cytoplasmic leftovers, introduce ether and shake like an unhinged Victorian chemist to remove any leftovers of the cytoplasm.
✅ Step5: Precipitate Mystery Goo – The ‘Eureka’ Moment! Add sodium carbonate (alkali) to your abused nuclei, then drown them in acid. Observe as a mysterious white precipitate emerges—Congratulations! You have officially bullied something into being!!
✅ Step 6: Observe and Take Notes on Your 'Discovery' – Watch as your ‘nuclein’ obediently solidifies in acid and vanishes in alkali, performing a neat chemical trick that proves… something. Convince yourself this is an entirely novel substance and not just the result of aggressive chemistry.
✅ Step 7: Verify ‘Purity’ by Setting It on Fire – Having worked tirelessly to extract this fragile substance, it's now time to destroy it. Burn it to analyze the byproducts! Phosphorus? Check. Nitrogen? Check. Sulfur? No? Great, it must not be protein. Declare the sacred blueprint of life!
✅ Step 8: Ascribe It to Heredity Without Any Real Evidence – Since your unknown substance came from nuclei, it must have something to do with heredity, right?
GENIUS! 🎉 BUT WAIT… IS THIS REALLY DNA? 🤔
🔥 Critics claim that dissolving organic material in acid and setting it on fire may not be the best way to isolate genetic material. Nonsense! We assure you, any 'hereditary substance' that somehow survives our 19th-century chemical gauntlet is 100% legitimate (because we say so).
Besides, if there was no DNA to begin with, how did we find it after chemically forcing it into existence? 🤷♂️ # CheckmateDeniers
FREQUENTLY AVOIDED QUESTIONS (FAQ)
🧐 Q: If DNA is the molecule of life, why does it need to be chemically reconstructed from cellular wreckage?
🔬 A: Silence, please. We are doing science.
🧐 Q: Why don’t we just isolate a fully intact, unmodified DNA molecule?
🔬 A: Because then we wouldn’t need grant money to keep “discovering” it.
🧐 Q: Isn’t this just circular reasoning?
🔬 A: Absolutely not! We assumed DNA exists, looked for DNA, and found what we assumed. That’s called scientific rigor.
LIMITED-TIME OFFER! ORDER YOUR "PURE" DNA TODAY!
🚀 For just $9.99, we’ll send you your very own sample of degraded nucleic acid sludge—freshly extracted from our state-of-the-art boiling vat of molecular destruction. Call now, and we’ll throw in an extra dose of hydrochloric ether —FREE! ⚗️
📞 Call 1-800-DNA-FAKE to claim your personalized double-helix experience! 🧬🕺
💰 Hurry! Supplies are infinite (because we can just dissolve more leukocytes in acid).
🚨 WARNING: MAY CONTAIN ZERO ACTUAL DNA.
☠️ Side effects include: extreme skepticism, spontaneous questioning of mainstream science, and an uncontrollable urge to expose scientific fraud.
Today's sponsor: The Acid Bath Consortium™ – “If It’s Not Chemically Mangled, It’s Not Real!”
Lol. :D check this article. for a refresher may be.
https://criticalcheck.wordpress.com/2021/12/15/dna-discovery-extraction-and-structure-a-critical-review/
👍👍GREAT RESOURCE!!
Dude, you seriously need to make these comments into posts!
If you dont I may have to!
Massive thanks for the positive feedback − it‘s truly appreciated!! 👍👍
If we can with 100% certainty say that genetics is pseudoscience, then we can with 100% certainty say that classification of viruses thus established fact that there are different families of viruses is false. Since classification is based on this body of knowledge.
https://criticalcheck.wordpress.com/2021/12/15/dna-discovery-extraction-and-structure-a-critical-review/#respond
this resource and jamies andrew's 3 part series dna hoax may be of help.
Mendelian genetics is real and the likes of cannabis plats have undergone selective breeding to give a vastly different product from what they started with.
Once you get into sequencing then I am in agreement that it's largely pseudoscience, and I spent 4 years of my life getting a degree in molecular biology, which had 75% of the classes shared with the genetics students.
The critical check website is very well done.
Thank you very much for this extensive and thought-provoking post. I completely concur with your main thesis that virology is based on circular reasoning in that it assumes what must be proven. One problem I see is that you assume that the existence of viruses has been scientifically established but better methods should be developed for isolating viruses that are separate from the problematic cell culture method based as it is in the logical fallacy of circular reasoning. This somewhat ironically, assumes what must be proven, which is that viruses physically exist and can be demonstrated by proper scientific methods. To date, the methods used are not free of the logical fallacy of circular reasoning nor are they scientific in the sense that the alleged virus is never actually/physically isolated, among other well-known deficiencies.
I may have misunderstood you, but your text seems to speak of viral isolation as if the cell culture method actually/physically isolates a virus, which it does not do if we interpret the term “isolation” to mean, physically separate it from all other constituents. Had you said, ‘other methods should be devised in an attempt to scientifically prove the existence of viruses’, I would agree. I look forward to hearing your reactions. Thanks again for your efforts.
Ego bound stupidity
Here's my version of no virus with more pictures https://jowaller.substack.com/p/seeing-is-believing
Your research paper on purification and isolation, and lack independent variable, scientific method would be good to read.
Can you apply the same reasoning to “Cancer”?
No comment??
And if that’s the case has it ever been clinically proven that cancer cells cause death? In other words, does someone die with or of cancer cells?
If so do you know the study?
You can see cancer cells under a microscope. Admittedly I don't know all the details, but it's a whole different ball game from all these indirect ways of "proving" a virus exists.
Cells usually undergo cell death / apoptosis after a while, but this doesn't happen in cancer cell lines, so we have the HeLa cell line that has been used for ages, and the cells don't die.